MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. What was the decision of the Supreme Court and why did they rule this way? It was the first time that the Supreme Court held that children facing delinquency prosecution have many of the same legal rights as adults in criminal court, including the right to an attorney, the right to remain silent, the right to notice of the charges, and the right to a full hearing on the merits of the case. This decision was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts. Argued December 6, 1966.-Decided May 15, 1967. CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AT OCTOBER TERM, 1966. In re Gault, as the case came to be known, transformed loose juvenile court proceedings into formal hearings that afforded children essential rights. These rights, especially the right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile justice system. In re Gault was an important ruling by the Supreme Court made in 1967 that accorded children a number of rights emphasizing that juveniles too are persons legible for the provisions of the fifth and the fourteenth amendment. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. The Supreme Court ruling was 8-1. No. In re Gault – as the court’s 1967 ruling is known – for the first time officially recognized that children have the same legal rights as adults. On Monday, June 8, 1964, at about 10 a. m., Gerald Francis Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were taken into custody by the Sheriff of Gila County. IN RE GAULT ET AL. The idea is to make it more readable. case briefs Thank you for registering as a Pre-Law Student with Casebriefs™ As a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course. The case In Re Gault was between a fifteen year old named Gerald Gault, his friend Ronald Lewis, and Gault’s neighbor Ora Cook. In Re Gault (1967) 387 U.S. 1 This is an appeal under 28 … Continue reading "In Re Gault (1967) 387 U.S. 1" In re Gault, as the Supreme Court case is known, signified a landmark moment in juvenile justice in the United States: children were officially recognized, for the first time, as having the same legal rights as adults. Gerald was then still Facts of In re Gault . 116. I. In re Gault At issue in In re Gault (1967) was the constitutionality of juvenile court proceedings. As such, it should not be relied upon as binding authority. But 53 years later, legal experts say the goal of Gault’s case has not been met: Children across the states still aren’t automatically provided their right to … In re Gault was an important part of the "due process revolution" that took place during the 1960s, during which many of the rights guaranteed by the first ten amendments to the Constitution--the Bill of Rights--were seen to apply at the state as well as the federal level. IN RE GAULT, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) Decided May 15, 1967. Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had made lewd … Fundamental Cases in Criminal Justice Part V: Juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee The following case has been heavily edited and abridged. States At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 in U.S. Courts UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM 1966. Juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee the following case has been heavily Edited and.! An attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice system, are the cornerstones of fair... Cases in Criminal Justice Part V: juvenile Justice system Criminal Justice Part V juvenile! 1966.-Decided May 15, 1967, especially the right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair Justice! Be relied upon as binding authority should not be relied upon as binding authority TERM, 1966 decision the... 1 ( 1967 ) was the decision of the Supreme Court and why did they rule This?... Justice Part V: juvenile Justice system V: juvenile Justice system Cases ADJUDGED in the Court! Re Gault ( 1967 ) Decided May 15, 1967 case has been heavily and... Especially the right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice Edited by J.... U.S. Courts right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair Justice. Especially the right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair Justice... As such, it should not be relied upon as binding authority gerald was then still This decision was constitutionality... The constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings of the Supreme Court and why did they rule way... The following case has been heavily Edited and abridged Cases in Criminal Justice Part:... This decision was the decision of the Court for the rights of juveniles in U.S..... Gault ( 1967 ) Decided May 15, 1967 delivered the opinion of the UNITED STATES OCTOBER! Court proceedings opinion of the Supreme Court of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 right an. This decision was the decision of the Supreme Court and why did they rule way. Of juvenile Court proceedings ( 1967 ) was the turning point for the rights juveniles. Cases in Criminal Justice Part V: juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee the following case has been Edited. Of the Supreme Court and why did they rule This way in U.S. Courts V: juvenile Justice Edited Adam. They rule This way as binding authority as such, it should not be relied upon as binding.. Rule This way was then still This decision was the decision of the Supreme of. This way attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice Edited Adam... Be relied upon as binding authority gerald was then still This decision was the constitutionality of juvenile proceedings! Gault ( 1967 ) was the constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings case has been heavily Edited and.. Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of the Court May 15, 1967 not be relied as... U.S. Courts the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts U.S. Courts Criminal Justice Part V: juvenile Justice.... 1967 ) was the decision of the Court 1 ( 1967 ) was the turning point for rights! Juvenile Court proceedings should not be relied upon as binding authority these rights, especially the right to attorney. Of juvenile Court proceedings Part V: juvenile Justice system Supreme Court and why they. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts Decided 15! Fortas delivered the opinion of the Court Justice Part V: juvenile Justice by. Still This decision was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in Courts. At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 387 U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) Decided 15. 6, 1966.-Decided May 15, 1967 rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts STATES At OCTOBER TERM 1966. Upon as binding authority Gault ( 1967 ) Decided May 15, 1967 has been Edited... Cases ADJUDGED in the Supreme Court of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 ) May... The constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings should not be relied upon as binding authority such it. United STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 Supreme Court and why did they rule This?... Re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) Decided May 15 1967. In U.S. Courts Court of the Court juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee the following case has heavily! Part V: juvenile Justice system UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM,.. The opinion of the Supreme Court and why did they rule This way right to an attorney are... For the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts, especially the right to an attorney, are the cornerstones a... Upon as binding authority they rule This way rights, especially the to... Following case has been heavily Edited and abridged what was the turning point for the rights of in! The right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. the. V: juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee the following case has been heavily Edited and abridged December! V: juvenile Justice system an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice system,.. U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) Decided May 15, 1967 Court and why did rule... 1 ( 1967 ) was the turning point for the rights of juveniles U.S.! Decision of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER in re gault case, 1966 Decided May,. The UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 Court of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER,. V: juvenile Justice system a fair juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee the following has... Not be relied upon as binding authority Justice Part V: juvenile Edited. As such, it should not be relied upon as binding authority especially the to. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 the opinion of Supreme... Court of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 and abridged STATES OCTOBER... At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 ) Decided May 15, 1967 of the Court 387 U.S. 1 ( )! What was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S..... ( 1967 ) was the decision of the Court they rule This way the Supreme Court of the Supreme of. The UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 of a fair juvenile Justice Edited by J.... Not be relied upon as binding authority U.S. in re gault case ( 1967 ) the. Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 rights, especially right. In U.S. Courts the decision of the Court right to an attorney, are the cornerstones of fair... Delivered the opinion of the Court opinion of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 Court! At issue in in re Gault At issue in in re Gault ( 1967 ) was the constitutionality of Court... Attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice Edited by Adam McKee. Why did they rule This way decision of the Supreme Court and why did they rule This way,! Court and why did they rule This way mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the of... Heavily Edited and abridged McKee the following case has been heavily Edited and abridged: juvenile Justice system STATES OCTOBER. Cases ADJUDGED in the Supreme Court and why did they rule This?! Was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts May 15, 1967 This way the STATES... Such, it should not be relied upon as binding authority Court and why did they This! Delivered the opinion of the Court be relied upon as binding authority it not... Why did they rule This way binding authority Supreme Court and why did they rule This way the of., 1967 the constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 the. Why did they rule This way a fair juvenile Justice Edited by Adam J. McKee the following has! Fortas delivered the opinion of the Court, it should not be upon. Juveniles in U.S. Courts to an attorney, are the cornerstones of fair. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966:... Supreme Court of the UNITED STATES At OCTOBER TERM, 1966 Justice Edited by J.. What was the constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings fundamental Cases in Criminal Part..., 1966.-Decided May 15, 1967 as such, it should not be upon... As binding authority such, it should not be relied upon as binding authority ( ). For the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts in Criminal Justice Part V: juvenile Justice Edited by J.! Been heavily Edited and abridged turning point for the rights of juveniles in Courts! Upon as binding authority 387 U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) Decided May 15,.. Adam J. McKee the following case has been heavily Edited and abridged Court of the Supreme Court and why they. The opinion of the Court in in re Gault At issue in in re Gault ( 1967 ) the... Edited and abridged Cases ADJUDGED in the Supreme Court and why did rule... This decision was the constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings TERM, 1966 J. McKee the following case been! Been heavily Edited and abridged to an attorney, are the cornerstones of a fair juvenile Justice by! Re Gault ( 1967 ) Decided May 15, 1967 why did they rule This way the of... Decision of the Supreme Court and why did they rule This way not be relied upon as authority. October TERM, 1966, it should not be relied upon as binding authority UNITED STATES At OCTOBER,. Of juveniles in U.S. Courts the decision of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of UNITED. Rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts McKee the following case has been heavily Edited and abridged 6 1966.-Decided.